<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cedega 5.1 Performance Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8215/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8215</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8215/comment-page-1#comment-31024</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would honestly think that most people use their home-computers for playing games - so why not test against WindowsXP Home Ed.???

/G]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would honestly think that most people use their home-computers for playing games &#8211; so why not test against WindowsXP Home Ed.???</p>
<p>/G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8215/comment-page-1#comment-31023</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 02:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cedega broke from wine a while back, and I&#039;m sure they don&#039;t implement the directX 9 api&#039;s like wine does, i belive they were using directX 8. And with the games, was phoronix using the directX renderers, or opengl? Also what desktop on FC4? To get optimal performance (and a real benchmark of how linux handles native games), shouldn&#039;t they be using a lightweight window manager like FLWM?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cedega broke from wine a while back, and I&#8217;m sure they don&#8217;t implement the directX 9 api&#8217;s like wine does, i belive they were using directX 8. And with the games, was phoronix using the directX renderers, or opengl? Also what desktop on FC4? To get optimal performance (and a real benchmark of how linux handles native games), shouldn&#8217;t they be using a lightweight window manager like FLWM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8215/comment-page-1#comment-31018</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[when I got to part where it says they tested doom 3 and ET I started laughing and immediately stopped reading..consider this a large degree of FUD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when I got to part where it says they tested doom 3 and ET I started laughing and immediately stopped reading..consider this a large degree of FUD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
