Comments on: Phoronix on ATI in ’05 http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090 Embrace your Inner Penguin Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:38:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090/comment-page-1#comment-30604 Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:41:08 +0000 #comment-30604 since linux doesn’t have

http://www.mojomastergame.com/

]]> By: http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090/comment-page-1#comment-30600 Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:23:31 +0000 #comment-30600 So…NVIDIA’s drivers at the start were good and much better than ATI’s. ATI’s drivers were crap at the start of 2005. ATI’s drivers have improved, but at the end of 2005, they’re still less performant than NVIDIA’s and still have a considerable number of issues. Thus, ATI has had a good 2005! Wait, there’s something wrong with that logic…

]]> By: http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090/comment-page-1#comment-30599 Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:19:31 +0000 #comment-30599 Phoronix has now posted a NVIDIA variant:

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=5440

]]> By: http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090/comment-page-1#comment-30586 Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:44:41 +0000 #comment-30586 Yeah,

the fact that ATI is a BedBuddy(tm R (c) patent pending) of the evil empire is enough for me to buy nvidia or matrox or xgi or powervr.

]]> By: http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090/comment-page-1#comment-30583 Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:45:25 +0000 #comment-30583 Criticizing ATI for poor “distribution compatibility” seems excessive – their installer actually manages to build quite a wide array of packages. Meanwhile the nVidia driver just loses track of XVideo after a while. On the other hand, ATI have stated that suspend/resume works in the release notes at least three times iirc, and it has never been true.

]]>