<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phoronix on ATI in &#8216;05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090#comment-30604</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30604</guid>
		<description>since linux doesn't have 

http://www.mojomastergame.com/

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since linux doesn&#8217;t have </p>
<p><a href="http://www.mojomastergame.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mojomastergame.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090#comment-30600</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30600</guid>
		<description>So...NVIDIA's drivers at the start were good and much better than ATI's.  ATI's drivers were crap at the start of 2005.  ATI's drivers have improved, but at the end of 2005, they're still less performant than NVIDIA's and still have a considerable number of issues.  Thus, ATI has had a good 2005!  Wait, there's something wrong with that logic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;NVIDIA&#8217;s drivers at the start were good and much better than ATI&#8217;s.  ATI&#8217;s drivers were crap at the start of 2005.  ATI&#8217;s drivers have improved, but at the end of 2005, they&#8217;re still less performant than NVIDIA&#8217;s and still have a considerable number of issues.  Thus, ATI has had a good 2005!  Wait, there&#8217;s something wrong with that logic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090#comment-30599</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30599</guid>
		<description>Phoronix has now posted a NVIDIA variant:

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=5440</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phoronix has now posted a NVIDIA variant:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=5440" rel="nofollow">http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=5440</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090#comment-30586</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30586</guid>
		<description>Yeah,

the fact that ATI is a BedBuddy(tm R (c) patent pending) of the evil empire is enough for me to buy nvidia or matrox or xgi or powervr.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah,</p>
<p>the fact that ATI is a BedBuddy(tm R (c) patent pending) of the evil empire is enough for me to buy nvidia or matrox or xgi or powervr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/8090#comment-30583</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30583</guid>
		<description>Criticizing ATI for poor "distribution compatibility" seems excessive - their installer actually manages to build quite a wide array of packages. Meanwhile the nVidia driver just loses track of XVideo after a while. On the other hand, ATI have stated that suspend/resume works in the release notes at least three times iirc, and it has never been true. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Criticizing ATI for poor &#8220;distribution compatibility&#8221; seems excessive - their installer actually manages to build quite a wide array of packages. Meanwhile the nVidia driver just loses track of XVideo after a while. On the other hand, ATI have stated that suspend/resume works in the release notes at least three times iirc, and it has never been true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
