<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riotball 1.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/7748/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/7748</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsheedy</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/7748/comment-page-1#comment-29613</link>
		<dc:creator>jsheedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though it looks as if this game is well put together, I most likely will not buy it.  I did like Arkanoid, but 15 years ago.  I still may play it a little now and then, but LBreakout2, and other free versions will fill that void.  It is nice they have a linux version, I just hope the development for the linux version did not cost a lot.  I would hate to see them look at the sales of a linux version, and say that there is not market at all.  There is a market, just not a wide market.  Under linux, it would be hard to sell a game that is so much like others out there that are free.  If you plan to release your games under linux, you need to make sure it would be a game that 1) fills a void, 2) so much more polished over other versions, or 3)  Brand new, and highly anticipated (doom 3).  

Of course I do not know for sure, so my assumptions that this game may not sell well could very well be incorrect.  

What does everyone else think?  Please don&#039;t respond with the, &quot;Shut up, If you don&#039;t what it, don&#039;t buy it&quot; crap. I am looking for an actual well thought out comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though it looks as if this game is well put together, I most likely will not buy it.  I did like Arkanoid, but 15 years ago.  I still may play it a little now and then, but LBreakout2, and other free versions will fill that void.  It is nice they have a linux version, I just hope the development for the linux version did not cost a lot.  I would hate to see them look at the sales of a linux version, and say that there is not market at all.  There is a market, just not a wide market.  Under linux, it would be hard to sell a game that is so much like others out there that are free.  If you plan to release your games under linux, you need to make sure it would be a game that 1) fills a void, 2) so much more polished over other versions, or 3)  Brand new, and highly anticipated (doom 3).  </p>
<p>Of course I do not know for sure, so my assumptions that this game may not sell well could very well be incorrect.  </p>
<p>What does everyone else think?  Please don&#8217;t respond with the, &#8220;Shut up, If you don&#8217;t what it, don&#8217;t buy it&#8221; crap. I am looking for an actual well thought out comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hohlraum</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/7748/comment-page-1#comment-29612</link>
		<dc:creator>Hohlraum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 14:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://lgames.sourceforge.net/index.php?project=LBreakout2

been around forever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lgames.sourceforge.net/index.php?project=LBreakout2" rel="nofollow">http://lgames.sourceforge.net/index.php?project=LBreakout2</a></p>
<p>been around forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
