<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neverwinter Miscellany</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/7117/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/7117</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/7117/comment-page-1#comment-27155</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-27155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are seling game contant(model, music, sound) so make the source avaible wont hurt any one. i think it a good idea. it would increase quality on linux and windows platforme and allow suport of curenlty not suported platforme. just look at all the id&#039;s Quake port out ther.

i am not agaist close source software but i belive that at somme point, the sources must be avaible to the costumers so they can suport them self the &quot;outdated&quot; product.

As for the lisence side of thing it must allow  redistribution for non-comercial purpose. not every one is a programer and can write the neceseray code to make it work on new version of, let say, linux 6.1 or windows Ultra XP 2010

--Bob
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are seling game contant(model, music, sound) so make the source avaible wont hurt any one. i think it a good idea. it would increase quality on linux and windows platforme and allow suport of curenlty not suported platforme. just look at all the id&#8217;s Quake port out ther.</p>
<p>i am not agaist close source software but i belive that at somme point, the sources must be avaible to the costumers so they can suport them self the &#8220;outdated&#8221; product.</p>
<p>As for the lisence side of thing it must allow  redistribution for non-comercial purpose. not every one is a programer and can write the neceseray code to make it work on new version of, let say, linux 6.1 or windows Ultra XP 2010</p>
<p>&#8211;Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
