<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wine Cellar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/6854/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/6854</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/6854#comment-25544</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 03:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25544</guid>
		<description>[b]Enough! I want the games for Linux![/b] :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[b]Enough! I want the games for Linux![/b] :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theoddone33</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/6854#comment-25533</link>
		<dc:creator>theoddone33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25533</guid>
		<description>The reviewer said he gave WineX a perfect score in his review because it was documented and did what Transgaming told him it would do.  It's funny that a product can get a perfect review on Linux because it provides documentation and works as advertised.

Aren't these pretty much standard things to expect from commercial-quality software?!  It seems to me that a perfect score should reflect something higher.  Otherwise it's a poor commentary on the state of Linux software.  None of it is documented?  None of it works as advertised?

Additionally, the reviewers tests were limited.  WineX performed well for three game demos... one of which runs natively on Linux anyway.  I'm not sure this is a sufficient test for the hardcore dual-booter considering purchasing WineX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviewer said he gave WineX a perfect score in his review because it was documented and did what Transgaming told him it would do.  It&#8217;s funny that a product can get a perfect review on Linux because it provides documentation and works as advertised.</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t these pretty much standard things to expect from commercial-quality software?!  It seems to me that a perfect score should reflect something higher.  Otherwise it&#8217;s a poor commentary on the state of Linux software.  None of it is documented?  None of it works as advertised?</p>
<p>Additionally, the reviewers tests were limited.  WineX performed well for three game demos&#8230; one of which runs natively on Linux anyway.  I&#8217;m not sure this is a sufficient test for the hardcore dual-booter considering purchasing WineX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/6854#comment-25532</link>
		<dc:creator>Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25532</guid>
		<description>A company pointing out reviews of its products to a news website... how, uh, something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A company pointing out reviews of its products to a news website&#8230; how, uh, something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
