<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinuxHardware.org Gigahertz Processor Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/4342/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/4342</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wee</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/4342/comment-page-1#comment-3346</link>
		<dc:creator>wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From everything I&#039;ve read (on Anandtech, Tom&#039;s, etc), Intel chips perform better in Quake3 than AMD chips due to specific optimizations.  This is the case in Photoshop as well (not a Linux app, I know, but it&#039;s a common benchmark).  Better would be to set up Tux Racer and benchmark that.  Including POVBench scores would also have been a plus for floating point performance.  I also would have liked to see some GIMP scores. 

Anyway, if all you play is Q3, then a P4 might be worth it to you (even with their 2ms NOOP shenanigans) since it works pretty darn well with that game specfifically.  For general computing, I&#039;ve found the Athlons have given me plenty of bang for relatively little buck (for example, the $80 you save buying an Athlon could mean another 256 MB RAM, motherboard savings mean bigger disk, etc).

-B]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From everything I&#8217;ve read (on Anandtech, Tom&#8217;s, etc), Intel chips perform better in Quake3 than AMD chips due to specific optimizations.  This is the case in Photoshop as well (not a Linux app, I know, but it&#8217;s a common benchmark).  Better would be to set up Tux Racer and benchmark that.  Including POVBench scores would also have been a plus for floating point performance.  I also would have liked to see some GIMP scores. </p>
<p>Anyway, if all you play is Q3, then a P4 might be worth it to you (even with their 2ms NOOP shenanigans) since it works pretty darn well with that game specfifically.  For general computing, I&#8217;ve found the Athlons have given me plenty of bang for relatively little buck (for example, the $80 you save buying an Athlon could mean another 256 MB RAM, motherboard savings mean bigger disk, etc).</p>
<p>-B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
