<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: /dev/urandom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/2524/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/2524</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temporal</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/2524/comment-page-1#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Temporal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Regarding the transcription from the nVidia interview, there are a few more important quotes.  My favorite is when he points out that all of the over 100 software engineers at nVidia are essentially working on the Linux drivers, since they use the same code base as the Windows ones.  This is a definate advantage that wouldn&#039;t be possible if they had used DRI.  It also shows alot more direct support for Linux than any other graphics card company has shown.  (As I understand it, ATI and Matrox are each paying for one PI engineer to work on Linux drivers.)  Sure, I&#039;d prefer open source drivers, but I&#039;d rather have the strong Linux support nVidia is showing than the weak support shown by most companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the transcription from the nVidia interview, there are a few more important quotes.  My favorite is when he points out that all of the over 100 software engineers at nVidia are essentially working on the Linux drivers, since they use the same code base as the Windows ones.  This is a definate advantage that wouldn&#8217;t be possible if they had used DRI.  It also shows alot more direct support for Linux than any other graphics card company has shown.  (As I understand it, ATI and Matrox are each paying for one PI engineer to work on Linux drivers.)  Sure, I&#8217;d prefer open source drivers, but I&#8217;d rather have the strong Linux support nVidia is showing than the weak support shown by most companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilBill</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/2524/comment-page-1#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilBill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will second what Temporal had to say in that I would prefer open source drivers but I am quite happy with the strong support nVidia is showing.
  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will second what Temporal had to say in that I would prefer open source drivers but I am quite happy with the strong support nVidia is showing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeq</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/2524/comment-page-1#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The excuse to not open source the driver because it has SGI intellectual property is suspect because SGI has open sourced openGL.  I am sure that SGI who is opening lots of stuff, VA/Linux who believes in open source, and Nvidia could come to an agreement on opening the driver at anytime.

Calling the openGL that grew out of MESA GL &#039;fakeGL&#039; is kind of childish, especially since it will be able to pass the same qualification tests with time.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The excuse to not open source the driver because it has SGI intellectual property is suspect because SGI has open sourced openGL.  I am sure that SGI who is opening lots of stuff, VA/Linux who believes in open source, and Nvidia could come to an agreement on opening the driver at anytime.</p>
<p>Calling the openGL that grew out of MESA GL &#8216;fakeGL&#8217; is kind of childish, especially since it will be able to pass the same qualification tests with time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
