<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero Ballistics will be released for FREE in 2010?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14640/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14640</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:06:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlickMcRunfast</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14640/comment-page-1#comment-330236</link>
		<dc:creator>SlickMcRunfast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxgames.com/?p=14640#comment-330236</guid>
		<description>The game is pretty fun, but incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game is pretty fun, but incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthrax</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14640/comment-page-1#comment-330235</link>
		<dc:creator>anthrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxgames.com/?p=14640#comment-330235</guid>
		<description>&quot;Being released for free&quot; is nowhere as good news as &quot;being released as a free software&quot;. One of the choices in the voting (Awesome! I&#039;d like to take part in the further development) suggests the latter (or at least open source), which would really be great, but I&#039;d like to have something more informative and proved than a random forum post with a voting as a source for linuxgames.com news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Being released for free&#8221; is nowhere as good news as &#8220;being released as a free software&#8221;. One of the choices in the voting (Awesome! I&#8217;d like to take part in the further development) suggests the latter (or at least open source), which would really be great, but I&#8217;d like to have something more informative and proved than a random forum post with a voting as a source for linuxgames.com news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

