<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skulltag 98a</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14319/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14319</link>
	<description>Embrace your Inner Penguin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:06:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stperr</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14319/comment-page-1#comment-330070</link>
		<dc:creator>stperr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxgames.com/?p=14319#comment-330070</guid>
		<description>Actually, I believe that they ARE under legal obligation to release the source.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Many many many ZDoom and GZDoom updates: The 97dx branch of Skulltag was locked in 2007. 98a is fresh and updated, allowing mappers to do many new things!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aren&#039;t ZDoom and GZDoom released under the GPL? Wouldn&#039;t that then require Skulltag to be released under the GPL? I don&#039;t know for sure if ZDoom and GZDoom are released under the GPL (the Doom source was re-released under the GPL in 1999, though).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I believe that they ARE under legal obligation to release the source.</p>
<blockquote><p>Many many many ZDoom and GZDoom updates: The 97dx branch of Skulltag was locked in 2007. 98a is fresh and updated, allowing mappers to do many new things!</p></blockquote>
<p>Aren&#8217;t ZDoom and GZDoom released under the GPL? Wouldn&#8217;t that then require Skulltag to be released under the GPL? I don&#8217;t know for sure if ZDoom and GZDoom are released under the GPL (the Doom source was re-released under the GPL in 1999, though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinister13</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14319/comment-page-1#comment-330056</link>
		<dc:creator>sinister13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxgames.com/?p=14319#comment-330056</guid>
		<description>They say: &lt;i&gt;&quot;there is no legal obligation to release its source&quot;&lt;/i&gt;. OK, they are right, but who would bother to run this proprietary trojan sh%t? F%#k them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say: <i>&#8220;there is no legal obligation to release its source&#8221;</i>. OK, they are right, but who would bother to run this proprietary trojan sh%t? F%#k them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chammy</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/14319/comment-page-1#comment-330046</link>
		<dc:creator>chammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxgames.com/?p=14319#comment-330046</guid>
		<description>Blah, looks like the devs are just as selfish as always. A source port that isn&#039;t open source itself is just ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah, looks like the devs are just as selfish as always. A source port that isn&#8217;t open source itself is just ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

